The simple version is this: ministers provide services that atheists currently cant get. And in a
series of posts I mean to outline what those services are, why we could use
them, how to provide them safely, and so on. Today I am going to start with this question: "Who do you go to to help you understand what you believe?"
If you are not inclined to philosophical thought, which is
an inclination most people are blessed to be without, then certain ethical, moral and complex pragmatic problems seem vague and intractable. Or even worse they seem like a
mix of clear certainties and unanchored opinions. For example
most conversations about sexual ethics or the goodness of public policy. I am
hard pressed to think of where an atheist could turn to have these questions
addressed (not answered, addressed). I've tried to look for secular
sexual ethics and found literally nothing. When people talk about it at all,
people seem to have no clear ideas, unless they are (anti)religious ideas. And are you
going to look to political parties to tell you which policies are right and
which are wrong? They will tell you, but it’s a mix of self-righteous assertion
and political spin. Or how about the media? Those bastards are beyond useless. So is there anyone who you trust to have thought about these
kinds of issues? Do your friends have such a person?
If you're actively church going, then you have
a person to go to. A minister. That minister's
beliefs are grounded in foundational texts to which you subscribe. And you
don't have to take his word as gospel when it comes to welfare policy, but they
might be able to frame your questions. You may not like the way religions have handled this responsibility to date. But if you were an atheist when you hit puberty I
bet you would have been deeply relieved to have someone you trusted who you talk to. I know it would have saved me a lot of time in
high school.
Now you might say "This is exactly what we as atheists are avoiding. Priests and
ministers are authoritarian's with values I don't respect and wouldn't trust."
But if you consider the general case as I have carefully chosen to describe it,
you might see a different possibility. Religious ministers have a mission
rooted in theological texts. In order to maintain their credibility they must
seem to remain devoted to their foundational texts and the entities presupposed
by those texts. What if there was a minister who's "foundational
texts" where contemporary research and secular culture? You would have a
ministry of science.
A minister of science's mission would be to provide a congregation
with an effective and rational understanding of the world as it was empirically knowable. And god
knows, with all the flip flopping about the goodness of eggs, red wine and running
shoes, we could all the help. An atheist minister would not be offering interpretations of the Bible but
interpretations of the research. Someone who would do the reading that you
don't have time to do, and the thinking that seems too muddy to bother with and
make an honest argument for and against things on secular, ethical, rational
grounds.
Taken by itself, this one service sounds more like science
journalism than anything else, and that isn't an unfair way to characterize
this one service. But as I add other points of service for a secular ministry, it will
make more sense.
And feel free criticize, I need help seeing the other side
of these kinds of arguments.
